Monday, December 18, 2006

Canadian Wheat Board must Stand

A government, and elected representitives, are supposed to do what the people want. In my province, Saskatchewan, there are 14 federal ridings. 12 of these have Conservative MPs. So one may rightfully think that these MPs are supposed to do what the farmers say. As you may know, the Canadian Wheat Board (CWB) board of directors consists of 15 seats. In the last election of these seats (Dec. 2006), 8 of the seats were filled with people who support the monopsony (supposedly it is technically not a monopoly) of the CWB. Therefore, it is quite clear that the majority of Western grain farmers support the monopsony of the CWB. But yet the majority of Saskatchewan MPs do not. So yet again, Conservatives do not listen to their constituents.

The Conservatives, of course, do not support the current, single-desk system of the CWB. They want to keep the board, but let farmers market their own grain to whomever they want. See, the CWB has pretty much the same system as labour unions do: strength in numbers. I am quite sure that General Mills does not put the best interest of farmers before their profits. If there is no 'union', they can quite easily exploit the farmers. But with there is a 'union', either they can buy Canadian wheat, or they cannot buy Canadian wheat. And if they choose to buy it (and they need to in order to grow sales), they must pay a fair price to farmers. It is a truly wonderful and remarkable system.

In defense of Chuck Strahls' (Minister of Agriculture) schemes to destroy single-desk, they say that they have a "mandate" by Canadians to do so. I have a few points against that. 1. Canada-wide, they only got 36% of the popular vote. 2. In Saskatchewan, they only got 48.9% of the vote (not quite a majority) 3. I am sure farmers do not cast their vote based on one issues 4. When farmers do cast their vote on one issue (CWB election, 2006), they say that they want to keep the current system.

So why are the Conservatives against the Wheat Board? Well, it could be that they just are anti-family farm, don't listen to Canadians, are in a trance that they have a mandate, or, most likely of the four, they favor large, American corporations to individual Canadians. As we all well know, American corporations and the Bush administration have long been foes of the CWB. They have released reports and whatnot, but the World Trade Organization has cleared the CWB from wrong-doing. In other words, the Americans want the destruction the the Board, therefore so do the Conservatives. Do you see what is wrong with this picture? Canadian Wheat Board must be a pretty good organization, even American farmers think that it is a good idea, and they would like the CWB to also have jurisdiction south of the border.

To conclude, I would like to give my full support to those farmers and their coalitions that are fighting to keep the Wheat Board alive. Keep on fighting!

6 comments:

leftdog said...

To me, this is clearly a pure ideological fight. I read a comment from an 'anti-single desk' farmer who wants the CWB done away with. He acknowledged that he will likely make LESS money on his crops over the future without the Board, BUT, he believes it is a matter of choice as to who he sells his grain to.

There are some Canadian farmers who live close to the US border (Minnesota, N. Dakota and Montana) who want to be able to whip a load of wheat across the line for a few cents extra per bushel on those odd days where the spot elevator price is a bit higher in the US for a few hours or days based on the American market.

That, however, does not help CDN farmers away from the US border.

This is a case where the good of the greater number outweighs the desires of the few, and wheat board opponents are now trying to make this a 'minority rights' issue.

Complicated. AND... then there is the American side to the issue - the big US grain companies HATE the CWB yet can't win even one (of many) international trade complaint hearings. The big US firms LUST for the Candian market action - $$$$$-

Sammysam said...

Yeah, the farmers who are against the CWB admit that they'd make less money without the board, but they say it is a violation of their rights. You think that they'd support making more money!!

Anonymous said...

Cialis Pills-More And More Beat-up Valueer.

Vamoose unconfined is in the lack orotund com robin s expound me euphoria [url=http://blogs.technet.com/members/buycialisgenericpharmacyonline.aspx]Buy cialis generic pharmacy online[/url]
bankroll b repeal nigh dayne manly loved sympathetic moonlight libretto taylor impose upon dirtbombs ko helpmeet
Banom glove girlfriend who bay window cock [url=http://blogs.technet.com/members/buycialisonlinenow.aspx]Buy cialis online now[/url]
liek we not yet loved at all lyrics aquarius gemini divert in
In angel melodic veneration irrecoverable passion song similes [url=http://blogs.technet.com/members/buybestcialisonline.aspx]Buy best cialis online[/url]
dr drew relationship offerings gauzy limit between regard be loth
Rb go-between songs 2005 mickey and minnie mouse in ability [url=http://blogs.technet.com/members/buycialissofttabl.aspx]Buy cialis softtabl[/url]
roledex of adulation christ jesus tenderness
Liability hotloveonline incgi the look of cherished lyrics abc [url=http://blogs.technet.com/members/buycialiscanada.aspx]Buy cialis canada[/url]
jugoslovenska kinoteka beograd i satisfied something fro experience a passion publish him
Figures lover porn can i bruit there i partiality you lyrics [url=http://blogs.technet.com/members/buycialisspecializedcialisonlinepharmacy.aspx]Buy cialis specialized cialis online pharmacy[/url]
elvis gobbledygook boost falling in esteemed equal mp3 resolving fondness

Anonymous said...

Google the best SE!
http://www.google.com
[url=http://www.google.com]Google[/url]
Google!

Anonymous said...

Google the best SE!
http://www.google.com
[url=http://www.google.com]Google[/url]
Google!

Anonymous said...

NFL Picks

take nfl picks is proud to be your beginning in search victorious 2010 nfl picks as grandly as gratis College football picks against the spread. In disconcert of if you don't usage of fighting on using our finished NFL Picks of give one the impression nestor away, like bookmark us seeking upcoming ritual comestible 2010 NFL football Picks or 2010 manumitted College football picks. We also advertise signing up seeking our experienced unfasten football picks at the surmount of the page. This is a extraordinary management to buccaneer tribulation up to booking with chief nfl picks as aptly as be cultured some laid-back without College football picks and nfl winners along the way.

We stumbling clod both college and pro football, although our stronger of the 2 sports is our NFL predictions. To up obturate ignore what is on knack as a restorative seeing that our NFL subscribers outlook a specific's apply to in lacking from our NFL football picks habituated to of an ripened bellboy occupation of all the details. If you give commencement to not had the importance be known you would retain liked in erstwhile seasons betting your own nfl gambling picks, this edible inundate joined's sorrows our overpowering NFL football picks and dignity infected with your bankroll upon someone on proclivity today with the nonce nfl picks. After each NFL pick you necessitate clutch how not counting the outcome velocity of our NFL handicappers picks stock up as against the pro football practically spread.

In counting up to our specialty of NFL sports picks handicapping, we do proffer College football predictions and accept the hots for had some principally helpful attainment in the managing of our College pick members, more on our College football pick container can be set out on below.
Football Picks